I.
A QUESTION OF THE AGES.
Is a Lie Ever Justifiable?–Two Proffered Answers.–Inducements
and Temptations Influencing a Decision.–Incident in Army Prison
Life.–Difference in Opinion.–Killing Enemy, or Lying to
Him.–Killing, but not Lying, Possibility with God.–Beginning of this
Discussion.–Its Continuance.–Origin of this Book.
II.
ETHNIC CONCEPTIONS.
Standards and Practices of Primitive Peoples.–Sayings and Doings of
Hindoos.–Teachings of the Mahabharata.–Harischandra and
Viswamitra, the Job and Satan of Hindoo Passion-Play.–Scandinavian
Legends.–Fridthjof and Ingeborg.–Persian Ideals.–Zoroastrian Heaven
and Hell.–”Home of Song,” and “Home of the Lie.”–Truth the Main
Cardinal Virtue with Egyptians.–No Hope for the Liar.–Ptah, “Lord
of Truth.”–Truth Fundamental to Deity.–Relatively Low Standard
of Greeks.–Incidental Testimony of Herodotus.–Truthfulness of
Achilles.–Plato.–Aristotle.–Theognis.–Pindar.–Tragedy of
Philoctetes.–Roman Standard.–Cicero.–Marcus Aurelius.–German
Ideal.–Veracity a Primitive Conception.–Lie Abhorrent among Hill
Tribes of India.–Khonds.–Sonthals.–Todas.–Bheels.–Sowrahs.–
Tipperahs.–Arabs.–American Indians.–Patagonians.–Hottentots.–
East Africans.–Mandingoes.–Dyaks of Borneo,–”Lying Heaps.”–Veddahs
of Ceylon.–Javanese.–Lying Incident of Civilization.–Influence of
Spirit of Barter.–”Punic Faith.”–False Philosophy of Morals.
III.
BIBLE TEACHINGS.
Principles, not Rules, the Bible Standard.–Two Pictures of
Paradise.–Place of Liars.–God True, though Men Lie.–Hebrew
Midwives.–Jacob and Esau.–Rahab the Lying Harlot.–Samuel at
Bethlehem.–Micaiah before Jehoshaphat and Ahab.–Character
and Conduct.–Abraham.–Isaac.–Jacob.–David.–Ananias and
Sapphira.–Bible Injunctions and Warnings.
IV.
DEFINITIONS.
Importance of a Definition.–Lie Positive, and Lie Negative.–Speech
and Act.–Element of Intention.–Concealment Justifiable, and
Concealment Unjustifiable.–Witness in Court.–Concealment that is
Right.–Concealment that is Sinful.–First Duty of Fallen Man.–Brutal
Frankness.–Indecent Exposure of Personal Opinion.–Lie Never
Tolerable as Means of Concealing.–False Leg or Eye.–Duty of
Disclosure Conditioned on Relations to Others.–Deception Purposed,
and Resultant Deception.–Limits of Responsibility for Results of
Action.–Surgeon Refusing to Leave Patient.–Father with Drowning
Child.–Mother and Wife Choosing.–Others Self-Deceived concerning
Us.–Facial Expression.–”A Blind Patch.”–Broken Vase.–Closed
Shutters in Midsummer.–Opened Shutters.–Absent Man’s Hat in
Front Hall.–When Concealment is Proper.–When Concealment is
Wrong.–Contagious Diseases.–Selling a Horse or Cow.–Covering
Pit.–Wearing Wig.–God’s Method with Man.–Delicate Distinction.–
Truthful Statements Resulting in False Impressions.–Concealing
Family Trouble.–Physician and Inquiring Patient.–Illustrations
Explain Principle, not Define it.
V.
THE PLEA OF “NECESSITY.”
Quaker and Dry-goods Salesman.–Supposed Profitableness of
Lying.–Plea for “Lies of Necessity.”–Lying not Justifiable between
Enemies in War-time.–Rightfulness of Concealing Movements and Plans
from Enemy.–Responsibility with Flag of Truce.–Difference
between Scout and Spy.–Ethical Distinctions Recognized by
Belligerents.–Illustration: Federal Prisoner Questioned by
Confederate Captors.–Libby Prison Experiences.–Physicians and
Patients.–Concealment not Necessarily Deception.–Loss of
Reputation for Truthfulness by Lying Physicians.–Loss of
Power Thereby.–Impolicy of Lying to Insane.–Dr. Kirkbride’s
Testimony.–Life not Worth Saving by Lie.–Concealing One’s Condition
from Robber in Bedroom.–Questions of Would-be Murderer.–”Do Right
though the Heavens Fall.”–Duty to God not to be Counted out of
Problem.–Deserting God’s Service by Lying.–Parting Prayer.
VI.
CENTURIES OF DISCUSSION.
Wide Differences of Opinion.–Views of Talmudists.–Hamburger’s
Testimony.–Strictness in Principle.–Exceptions in Practice.–Isaac
Abohab’s Testimony.–Christian Fathers not Agreed.–Martyrdom Price
of Truthtelling.–Justin Martyr’s Testimony.–Temptations of
Early Christians.–Words of Shepherd of Hermas.–Tertullian’s
Estimate.–Origen on False Speaking.–Peter and Paul at Antioch.–
Gregory of Nyssa and Basil the Great.–Deceit in Interests of
Harmony.–Chrysostom’s Deception of Basil.–Chrysostom’s Defense
of Deceit.–Augustine’s Firmness of Position.–Condemnation of
Lying.–Examination of Excuses.–Jerome’s Weakness and Error.–Final
Agreement with Augustine.–Repetition of Arguments of Augustine and
Chrysostom.–Representative Disputants.–Thomas Aquinas.–Masterly
Discussion.–Errors of Duns Scotus.–John Calvin.–Martin Luther.–
Ignatius Loyola.–Position of Jesuits.–Protestants Defending Lying.
–Jeremy Taylor.–Errors and Inconsistencies.–Wrong Definitions.–
Misapplication of Scripture.–Richard Rothe.–Character, Ability,
and Influence. in Definition of Lie.–Failure to Recognize.–Error
Love to God as Only Basis of Love to Man.–Exceptions in Favor of
Lying.–Nitzsch’s Claim of Wiser and Nobler Methods than Lying in
Love.–Rothe’s Claim of Responsibility of Loving Guardianship–No
Countenance of Deception in Example of Jesus.–Prime Error of Rothe.
–Opinions of Contemporary Critics.–Isaac Augustus Dorner.–
Character and Principles.–Keen Definitions.–High Standards.–
Clearness and Consistency.–Hans Lassen Martensen.–Logic Swayed by
Feeling.–Right Premises and Wavering Reasonings.–Lofty Ideals.–
Story of Jeanie Deans.–Correct Conclusions.–Influence of Personal
Peculiarities on Ethical Convictions.–Contrast of Charles Hodge and
James H. Thornwell.–Dr. Hodge’s Correct Premises and Amiable
Inconsistencies.–Truth the Substratum of Deity.–Misconceptions of
Bible Teachings.–Suggestion of Deception by Jesus Christ.–Error as
to General Opinion of Christians.–Dr. Hodge’s Conclusions Crushed
by his Premises.–Dr. Thornwell’s Thorough Treatment of Subject.–
Right Basis.–Sound Argument.–Correct Definitions.–Firmness for
Truth.–Newman Smyth’s Manual.–Good Beginning and Bad Ending.–
Confusion of Terms.–Inconsistencies in Argument.–Loose Reasoning.
–Dangerous Teachings.–James Martineau.–Fine Moral Sense.–Conflict
between Feeling and Conviction.–Safe Instincts.–Thomas Fowler.–
Higher Expediency of Veracity.–Importance to General Good.–Leslie
Stephen.–Duty of Veracity Result of Moral Progress.–Kant and
Fichte.–Jacobi Misrepresented.–False Assumptions by Advocates of Lie
of Necessity.–Enemies in Warfare not Justified in Lying.–Testimony
of Cicero.–Macaulay on Lord Clive’s Treachery.–Woolsey on
International Law.–No Place for Lying in Medical Ethics.–Opinions
and Experiences of Physicians.–Pliny’s Story of Roman Matron.–Victor
Hugo’s Sister Simplice.–Words of Abbe Sicard.–Tact and
Principle.–Legal Ethics.–Whewell’s View.–Opinion of Chief-Justice
Sharswood.–Mistakes of Dr. Hodge.–Lord Brougham’s Claim.–False
Charge against Charles Phillips.–Chancellor Kent on Moral
Obligations in Law and in Equity.–Clerical Profession Chiefly
Involved.–Clergymen for and against Lying.–Temptation to Lies of
Love.–Supreme Importance of Sound Principle.–Duty of Veracity to
Lower Animals.–Dr. Dabney’s View.–Views of Dr. Newman Smyth.–Duty
of Truthfulness an Obligation toward God.–Lower Animals not Exempt
from Principle of Universal Application.–Fishing.–Hunting.–Catching
Horse.–Professor Bowne’s Psychological View.–No Place for Lying
in God’s Universe.–Small Improvement on Chrysostom’s Argument for
Lying.–Limits of Consistency in Logical Plea.–God, or Satan.
VII.
THE GIST OF THE MATTER.
One All-Dividing Line.–Primal and Eternal Difference.–Lie Inevitably
Hostile to God.–Lying Separates from God.–Sin _per se_.–Perjury
Justifiable if Lying be Justifiable.–Lying–Lying Defiles Liar,
apart from Questions of Gain in Lying.–Social Evils Resultant from
Lying.–Confidence Essential to Society.–Lying Destructive of
Confidence.–Lie Never Harmless.
INDEXES.
TOPICAL INDEX. SCRIPTURAL INDEX.
